Companies that use Linear

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All project management Linear

Linear We detected 20,450 customers using Linear, 414 companies that churned, and 881 customers with upcoming renewal in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Software Development (25%) and the most common company size is 11-50 employees (45%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
Information Management Services, Inc. 201–500 IT Services and IT Consulting US 0% 2026-01-19
InCred Wealth 201–500 Investment Management IN +41.6% 2026-01-19
Indiespring 11–50 Software Development GB 0% 2026-01-19
IAGENTE: Agilize a comunicação e aumente as vendas de sua empresa 11–50 IT Services and IT Consulting BR +6.7% 2026-01-19
iB Arts Pvt Ltd - Web & IT solution company 51–200 Information Technology & Services IN N/A 2026-01-19
Hipocampus Centros de Aprendizaje 51–200 Education MX N/A 2026-01-19
Hippo Harvest 11–50 Farming US +32% 2026-01-19
H&D CONSEIL, le Recrutement et l'acccompagnement Autrement 2–10 Human Resources Services FR N/A 2026-01-19
Gianni's Fundraising 11–50 Fundraising N/A +48% 2026-01-19
Gazzoni Distribuidora De Pecas 51–200 Wholesale BR +2.8% 2026-01-19
Pennylane 501–1,000 Accounting FR +56.1% 2026-01-19
Free Law Project 11–50 Non-profit Organizations US +58.3% 2026-01-19
Fourth Dimension Systems Company 201–500 IT Services and IT Consulting SA +11.1% 2026-01-18
Flatpeak 11–50 Software Development GB +20% 2026-01-18
FloLogic 11–50 Computers and Electronics Manufacturing US +35.7% 2026-01-18
FELLOWPRO AG 11–50 Software Development DE +11.1% 2026-01-18
Faber Technologies 11–50 Software Development CA +20% 2026-01-18
Fanatic Games Ltd. 11–50 Computer Games CZ +6.7% 2026-01-18
Evidium 11–50 Software Development US -12.1% 2026-01-18
evoke 10,001+ Entertainment Providers N/A N/A 2026-01-18
Showing 1-20 of 20,450

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

Software Development 4447 (25%)
Technology, Information and Internet 2013 (11%)
IT Services and IT Consulting 1780 (10%)
Financial Services 1017 (6%)
Advertising Services 608 (3%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

11-50 employees 8912 (45%)
51-200 employees 5177 (26%)
2-10 employees 2661 (14%)
201-500 employees 1482 (8%)
501-1,000 employees 573 (3%)

📊 Who usually uses Linear and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Linear

Job titles that mention Linear
i
Job Title
Share
Director, Data Science
15%
Account Director
10%
Vice President, Sales
8%
Director, Analytics
8%
I noticed that Linear buyers span primarily leadership roles across commercial operations, with Directors of Data Science (15%), Account Directors (10%), and Vice Presidents of Sales (8%) leading procurement decisions. The hiring patterns reveal organizations prioritizing data-driven decision making, cross-functional collaboration, and multi-platform revenue growth. These leaders are building teams focused on bridging strategic planning with operational execution, particularly in fast-moving environments where they need to manage complex projects across distributed teams.

The day-to-day users appear to be product managers, engineers, strategists, and commercial teams who need to coordinate work across multiple stakeholders. References to needing tools for "non-linear" thinking, managing "complex programmes," and driving "integrated strategic planning" suggest teams using Linear to handle sophisticated workflows that don't follow traditional hierarchical structures. The emphasis on collaboration between product, engineering, and business functions indicates Linear supports cross-disciplinary coordination.

The pain points center on managing complexity at scale and enabling faster execution. Job descriptions repeatedly mention needs for "transforming ideas into shipped software," creating "linear and cohesive communication strategy," and building "high-performing teams" that can "move quickly yet thoughtfully." Companies are seeking people who can "translate complex business questions into actionable insights" and "drive decisions and continuously optimize performance," revealing organizations struggling to maintain clarity and momentum as they grow.

👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Linear?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 20,450 companies that use Linear

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Series D
35.5x
Funding Stage: Series A
30.3x
Funding Stage: Series B
28.0x
Industry: Software Development
10.8x
Industry: Data Infrastructure and Analytics
8.5x
Industry: Technology, Information and Internet
7.4x
I noticed that Linear's users span an incredibly wide range of industries, from software development and IT consulting firms to healthcare companies, manufacturing operations, financial services, and even circus schools. What unites them isn't what they build, but that they're building something complex that requires coordinated team effort. These are companies managing intricate projects, whether that's developing AI platforms, running clinical trials, coordinating construction projects, or scaling e-commerce operations.

These companies cluster in the 11-200 employee range, with a sweet spot around 50-150 people. Many are Series A or Series B funded startups, though there's also a significant contingent of bootstrapped companies and a few larger enterprises in the 200-500 range. The funding stages and employee counts suggest companies in their scaling phase, past the chaotic early days but not yet massive organizations. They're at the point where informal coordination breaks down and they need real project management tools.

🔧 What other technologies do Linear customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 20,450 companies that use Linear

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
191.3x
184.1x
165.0x
160.7x
101.8x
71.4x
I noticed that Linear users are overwhelmingly modern software companies building products for other developers or technical teams. The presence of Sentry, Vercel, and Retool together paints a clear picture: these are engineering-first organizations shipping software rapidly and prioritizing developer experience in their operations.

The Sentry and Linear pairing makes perfect sense because both tools serve teams that want elegant, fast interfaces for traditionally clunky workflows. Companies using both are likely managing substantial production applications where incident tracking needs to flow seamlessly into sprint planning. The Retool correlation is particularly telling since it suggests these companies build internal tools to move faster, rather than relying on off-the-shelf enterprise software. When I see Vercel in the mix, it confirms these teams favor modern deployment infrastructure and likely build with JavaScript frameworks. They want their operations stack to be as sleek as their deployment pipeline.

The full stack reveals product-led companies in growth stage, probably Series A through C. They have real production systems that need monitoring (Sentry, Cloudflare Zero Trust), actual customers generating product analytics (Amplitude), and enough complexity to warrant customer support infrastructure (Jira Service Desk). But they haven't yet succumbed to enterprise bloat. These companies sell primarily to technical buyers who evaluate products through trials and proof of concept rather than through traditional sales cycles.

Alternatives and Competitors to Linear

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Atlassian Jira Atlassian Jira Smartsheet Smartsheet Monday Monday Asana Asana Clickup Clickup Wrike Wrike

Loading data...