Companies that use Jetbrains

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All AI code assistant Jetbrains

Jetbrains We detected 2,223 companies using Jetbrains. The most common industry is Software Development (26%) and the most common company size is 51-200 employees (34%). We find new customers by monitoring new entries and modifications to company DNS records.

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
collectionHQ 11–50 Software Development GB -6.7%
Stubbe's Precast 501–1,000 Construction CA +14.1%
three rocks 11–50 Software Development GB +2.4%
Strata Decision Technology 201–500 Software Development US +14.5%
Syndicats eG 2–10 IT Services and IT Consulting DE 0%
let's dev GmbH & Co. KG 11–50 Information Technology & Services DE -13.2%
OPEN Digitalgruppe 201–500 IT Services and IT Consulting DE +37.2%
Rappit 201–500 Software Development NL +36%
Tabby | تابي 1,001–5,000 Financial Services SA +83.8%
DigitalMint 11–50 Financial Services US -14.8%
HealthRota 11–50 IT Services and IT Consulting GB +45.5%
mod.io 11–50 Software Development AU +20.9%
Improving 1,001–5,000 IT Services and IT Consulting US +9.9%
Protecht 201–500 Software Development AU +24.3%
EHE Health 51–200 Wellness and Fitness Services US +3.9%
april 51–200 Financial Services US +26.2%
Beyonder | Group 201–500 IT Services and IT Consulting NL +1392.9%
Output Inc. 51–200 Music US -20.9%
OTCF S.A. 1,001–5,000 Apparel Manufacturing PL N/A
PowerSchool 1,001–5,000 E-Learning Providers US +9.2%
Showing 1-20 of 2,223

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

Software Development 531 (26%)
IT Services and IT Consulting 300 (15%)
Financial Services 172 (8%)
Technology, Information and Internet 149 (7%)
Information Technology & Services 61 (3%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

51-200 employees 720 (34%)
11-50 employees 602 (28%)
201-500 employees 334 (16%)
501-1,000 employees 162 (8%)
1,001-5,000 employees 155 (7%)

📊 Who usually uses Jetbrains and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Jetbrains (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

Job titles that mention Jetbrains
i
Job Title
Share
Backend Engineer
39%
Frontend Engineer
9%
Director of Engineering
6%
DevOps Engineer
6%
I noticed that backend engineers make up 39% of the roles, with frontend engineers at 9% and DevOps engineers at 6%. Directors of engineering account for 6% of the positions. The buying decision appears to be distributed across technical leadership and engineering teams themselves, with directors and CTOs involved in tooling decisions. These organizations prioritize developer productivity, AI integration, and modernization of legacy systems. They're hiring for teams that need to move fast while maintaining quality.

The day-to-day users are primarily software engineers working across the full stack. They're using JetBrains IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA for Java development, alongside AI-assisted coding tools. One posting specifically mentions "experience with usage of the LLM-based solutions in daily workflow (ChatGPT, CoPilot, JetBrains AI Assistant, etc)" as a requirement. Another highlights that "the entire divize is adapted on products JetBrains" including IntelliJ IDEA, YouTrack, and TeamCity. Developers are writing code in Java, C#, Python, TypeScript, and other languages while collaborating in agile teams.

The pain points center on developer velocity and quality. Companies want to "make professional software development more productive and enjoyable" and "reduce developer friction." They're seeking engineers who can "write clean, maintainable, and testable code" while working in "complex, distributed environments." The emphasis on AI tools and modern development practices suggests organizations are trying to accelerate delivery without sacrificing code quality or developer experience.

👥 What types of companies use Jetbrains?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 2,223 companies that use Jetbrains

I noticed that JetBrains customers span an incredibly diverse range of what they actually build and sell. There are software development shops creating custom solutions for clients, fintech companies building payment and financial platforms, SaaS providers offering everything from HR tools to gaming analytics, and even manufacturers, retailers, educational institutions, and government agencies. What unites them is that they all have significant internal software development operations, whether that's building products to sell or creating technology to run their own operations more efficiently.

The companies range dramatically in maturity. I see early-stage startups with 10-20 employees and seed funding, mid-stage growth companies in Series A through C with hundreds of employees, and massive enterprises with 5,000-plus employees and public market presence. However, there's a notable concentration of companies in the 50-500 employee range that appear to be in active growth phases, either bootstrapped and profitable or venture-backed and scaling.

🔧 What other technologies do Jetbrains customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 2,223 companies that use Jetbrains

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
336.2x
274.2x
222.8x
221.2x
142.8x
71.3x
I noticed that companies using JetBrains are distinctly modern software development organizations that have invested heavily in premium, collaborative tooling across their entire operation. The presence of Atlassian Cloud, Docker Business, and advanced AI coding assistants like Cursor and Claude for Work tells me these are engineering-focused companies that treat developer productivity as a strategic advantage, not a cost center.

The pairing of JetBrains with Cursor (274x more likely) is particularly revealing. These companies aren't just writing code, they're adopting cutting-edge AI-assisted development tools while maintaining professional IDE environments. This suggests teams sophisticated enough to blend traditional development workflows with newer AI capabilities. Similarly, the strong correlation with Claude for Work shows these organizations are embedding AI deeply into their processes, likely for everything from code review to documentation. The combination with Miro at 142x more likely indicates these technical teams work closely with product and design counterparts, needing visual collaboration spaces that bridge technical and creative work.

My analysis shows these are product-led companies, likely in growth or scale-up stages. The prevalence of Figma Organization Plan and Miro suggests cross-functional collaboration between engineering, design, and product teams. Docker Business appearing 336x more likely points to mature engineering practices with containerized deployments. These aren't early-stage startups cobbling together free tools, nor enterprise giants stuck on legacy systems. They're well-funded companies building software products with 50 to 500 employees who can justify premium tooling investments.

Alternatives and Competitors to Jetbrains

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Sourcegraph Sourcegraph Cursor Cursor Cursor in a Open Source Repo Cursor in a Open Source Repo Github Copilot Github Copilot AI coding agents AI coding agents Jetbrains Jetbrains

Loading data...