Companies that use Accessibly

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All digital accessibility Accessibly

Accessibly We detected 2,547 customers using Accessibly and 110 customers with upcoming renewal in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Retail (62%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (70%). We find new customers by detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
Clean Mama 2–10 Retail US N/A 2026-01-20
Magnate Beauty 2–10 N/A N/A N/A 2026-01-19
MAC Mode GmbH & Co. KGaA 201–500 Retail Apparel and Fashion DE N/A 2026-01-19
Santa Barbara Trapeze Co. 11–50 Sports and Recreation Instruction US +11.1% 2026-01-17
Musée d'art de Joliette 11–50 Artists and Writers CA +3.8% 2026-01-16
POST SWIM 2–10 Retail Apparel and Fashion US 0% 2026-01-16
Under Your Skin 2–10 Retail US N/A 2026-01-15
Booth Creek Wagyu 11–50 Food and Beverage Retail US +26.7% 2026-01-15
Lip 'N Pour 2–10 Personal Care Product Manufacturing US 0% 2026-01-15
Image Coffee 2–10 Retail US N/A 2026-01-14
KenMed Surgical 2–10 Medical Equipment Manufacturing US +22.2% 2026-01-14
Karina Brez Jewelry 2–10 Retail US N/A 2026-01-14
garrnish 2–10 Retail US N/A 2026-01-14
Cool Crutches & Walking Sticks 2–10 Medical Equipment Manufacturing GB +200% 2026-01-11
Thrill Seekers 2–10 Retail US N/A 2026-01-11
Burning Flame Candle Company 1 employee Personal Care Product Manufacturing CA N/A 2026-01-10
Herr Beauty Co. 2–10 Personal Care Product Manufacturing CA 0% 2026-01-10
BURLEBO 11–50 Retail Apparel and Fashion US +36.1% 2026-01-08
Rebellion Body 2–10 Wellness and Fitness Services US N/A 2026-01-08
Lois Pearl Boutique 2–10 Retail US N/A 2026-01-08
Showing 1-20 of 2,547

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

Retail 1480 (62%)
Retail Apparel and Fashion 140 (6%)
Food and Beverage Services 84 (4%)
Manufacturing 80 (3%)
Personal Care Product Manufacturing 71 (3%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

2-10 employees 1768 (70%)
11-50 employees 446 (18%)
51-200 employees 202 (8%)
201-500 employees 54 (2%)
501-1,000 employees 14 (1%)

📊 Who usually uses Accessibly and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Accessibly

Job titles that mention Accessibly
i
Job Title
Share
Director, Business Development
14%
Director, Analytics
7%
Vice President, Business Development
4%
Director, Information Technology
3%
My analysis shows that Accessibly buyers are split across two primary domains. Business development directors (14%) lead the purchasing charge, focused on expanding market reach and generating revenue. Analytics directors (7%) represent the data-driven decision makers who need accessible insights to inform strategy. Leadership roles span business development, IT, product management, and research functions, all seeking to make their organizations' offerings and data "accessibly" available to broader audiences.

The day-to-day users appear to be product managers, designers, engineers, and data analysts who need to present information clearly across stakeholder groups. Multiple postings emphasize creating experiences that are "accessible" and "inclusive," transforming complex data into formats that diverse audiences can understand. Teams using Accessibly seem focused on democratizing access to information, whether that's economic data, business intelligence, research findings, or product features.

Three critical pain points emerge consistently. First, organizations want to make information "accessibly" available while maintaining quality and accuracy. Second, there's a strong emphasis on "inclusive" and "transparent" communication that reaches diverse stakeholders. Third, companies are trying to "translate complex data into actionable insights" and present findings "clearly and accessibly in the form of reports." These phrases reveal organizations struggling to bridge the gap between sophisticated analysis and practical, understandable outputs that drive decisions across technical and non-technical audiences alike.

👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Accessibly?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 2,547 companies that use Accessibly

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Industry: Personal Care Product Manufacturing
15.7x
Industry: Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry
13.8x
Industry: Apparel & Fashion
13.0x
Funding Stage: Series unknown
6.8x
Funding Stage: Seed
2.4x
Country: US
2.1x
I noticed that Accessibly's customers are predominantly retail and direct-to-consumer brands selling physical products. These companies span fashion and jewelry, beauty and skincare, food and beverage, sporting goods, home goods, and specialty retail. They're not tech companies or pure service businesses. They make things people touch, wear, eat, or display in their homes. Many sell through both physical locations and e-commerce, with a strong emphasis on online presence.

These companies skew small to mid-sized. Most have employee counts under 50, with many in the 2-10 range. They're past the earliest startup phase but still growing, what I'd call scaling challengers rather than established giants. The few larger companies (like Larsen & Toubro or UBA Group) seem to be outliers. Funding information is sparse, suggesting most are bootstrapped or traditionally financed rather than venture-backed. They've moved beyond proof-of-concept but haven't reached enterprise scale.

🔧 What other technologies do Accessibly customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 2,547 companies that use Accessibly

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
81.0x
77.4x
53.7x
41.7x
38.6x
23.2x
I noticed something really clear in this data: Accessibly users are predominantly direct-to-consumer e-commerce brands built on Shopify. The combination of Shopify as the core platform with Klaviyo for email marketing, Recharge for subscriptions, and Route.com for package tracking tells me these are consumer product companies selling physical goods online with recurring revenue models.

The pairing of Gorgias and Attentive is particularly revealing. Gorgias is a customer support platform designed specifically for e-commerce, while Attentive handles SMS marketing. Together with Klaviyo's email capabilities, this suggests companies that are heavily focused on direct customer communication across multiple channels. They're not just selling products, they're building relationships through personalized messaging. The Recharge integration adds another layer: these brands are likely selling consumables or products that benefit from subscription models, like beauty products, supplements, or pet food.

My analysis shows these companies operate with a marketing-led growth strategy. The emphasis on Klaviyo, Attentive, and customer communication tools indicates they acquire customers through digital marketing and then maximize lifetime value through retention tactics. Route.com's presence suggests they care deeply about post-purchase experience and reducing friction around shipping issues. These are likely mid-market DTC brands that have moved past the startup phase and are optimizing for customer retention and operational efficiency.

Alternatives and Competitors to Accessibly

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Accessiway Accessiway Clym Clym Eyeable Eyeable UsableNet UsableNet GSpeech GSpeech ResponsiveVoice ResponsiveVoice AudioEye AudioEye Acquia Optimize Acquia Optimize EqualWeb EqualWeb SiteImprove SiteImprove Equally AI Equally AI AccessiBe AccessiBe Accessibly Accessibly tabnav tabnav

Loading data...