Companies that use Sanity.io

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All web content management Sanity.io

Sanity.io We detected 4,011 customers using Sanity.io and 245 companies that churned or ended their trial. The most common industry is Software Development (13%) and the most common company size is 11-50 employees (36%). Our methodology involves detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.

About Sanity.io

Sanity.io provides a fully customizable content management system that stores content as structured data accessible through APIs, enabling teams to manage and deliver content across websites, apps, and multiple digital platforms.

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
Dovetail & Slate 51–200 Staffing and Recruiting GB +5.7% 2026-01-08
Deepgram 51–200 Software Development US +45.7% 2026-01-08
HEAL Security | Cyber Threat, Incidents, Risk & Situational Intelligence for Healthcare. 11–50 Computer and Network Security US -6.3% 2026-01-08
Diagonal Therapeutics 11–50 Biotechnology US +21.7% 2026-01-08
AIM 11–50 Technology, Information and Internet US +250% 2026-01-08
Chatbase 11–50 Software Development US +95% 2026-01-08
Secret Level 2–10 Entertainment Providers US +314.3% 2026-01-07
Manitou Pontoon Boats 51–200 Manufacturing US +7.8% 2026-01-06
Ottometric 11–50 IT Services and IT Consulting US +10.3% 2026-01-05
QurieGen 2–10 Biotechnology Research NL +600% 2026-01-05
Runbear 2–10 Technology, Information and Internet US +80% 2026-01-04
Aussie Buckets 11–50 Industrial Machinery Manufacturing AU -14.3% 2026-01-03
Lobo Ley - Abogados de Accidentes - Crim & Villalpando 11–50 Law Practice US 0% 2026-01-02
Maathra Technology and Consultancy Pvt Ltd 11–50 Software Development IN +13.3% 2025-12-31
Second Life 201–500 Environmental Services DE N/A 2025-12-31
Coursebox AI 2–10 Technology, Information and Internet AU +66.7% 2025-12-31
Eastern Construction Company Limited 51–200 Construction CA +4.3% 2025-12-30
Calvert Impact 11–50 Capital Markets US +3% 2025-12-30
Macal 51–200 Retail CL +0.6% 2025-12-30
Memberstack 11–50 Software Development US +9.1% 2025-12-28
Showing 1-20 of 4,011

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

Software Development 414 (13%)
Technology, Information and Internet 198 (6%)
Financial Services 174 (5%)
IT Services and IT Consulting 174 (5%)
Retail 151 (5%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

11-50 employees 1383 (36%)
51-200 employees 1091 (28%)
2-10 employees 592 (15%)
201-500 employees 395 (10%)
501-1,000 employees 184 (5%)

📊 Who in an organization decides to buy or use Sanity.io?

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Sanity.io

Job titles that mention Sanity.io
i
Job Title
Share
Frontend Engineer
37%
Backend Engineer
10%
Solutions Architect
6%
Content Marketing Specialist
6%
I noticed that frontend engineers dominate the hiring at 37%, followed by backend engineers at 10%, solutions architects at 6%, and content marketing specialists at 6%, with 41% in other roles. While only 3 of 51 postings are leadership positions, the purchasing decisions appear to come from technical leadership like heads of data, CTOs, and engineering managers who are building modern web experiences. These leaders prioritize headless CMS architecture, performance optimization, and scalable content operations that can support rapid growth.

The day-to-day users are overwhelmingly developers working across the stack. Frontend engineers build marketing sites and customer-facing applications using Sanity.io alongside React, Next.js, and TypeScript. I found numerous references to developers managing content workflows, integrating Sanity with third-party APIs, and building component-based UI systems. Content specialists and marketing teams also use Sanity to publish and update website content without requiring engineering support for every change.

The pain points center on modernizing legacy systems and enabling non-technical teams. Companies describe building "headless and traditional architecture," creating "fast, accessible, and elegant experiences," and establishing "scalable content operations." One posting explicitly seeks someone to "replace complexity and manual paperwork" while another emphasizes "making content easy to manage" for marketing teams. The recurring theme is eliminating bottlenecks between content creators and developers while maintaining technical excellence and site performance.

🔧 What other technologies do Sanity.io customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 4,011 companies that use Sanity.io

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
120.9x
111.1x
105.0x
63.1x
33.9x
14.7x
I noticed that Sanity.io users are overwhelmingly modern web development shops, specifically companies building with the Jamstack architecture. The extreme correlation with Vercel (111x more likely) and NextJS (121x more likely) tells me these are teams that have made deliberate choices about their technical architecture, favoring cutting-edge React frameworks and serverless deployment over traditional stacks. These aren't enterprises slowly migrating legacy systems. They're digitally native companies building fast, content-rich websites from the ground up.

The pairing of NextJS, Vercel, and Sanity makes perfect sense as a unified workflow. NextJS provides the React framework, Sanity serves as the headless CMS feeding content through APIs, and Vercel handles the deployment and hosting. This is the modern equivalent of the old WordPress-on-shared-hosting stack, but architected for performance and developer experience. The strong showing of Netlify (105x more likely) reinforces this, as it's Vercel's main competitor in the Jamstack hosting space. Linear's presence (34x more likely) suggests these teams care deeply about their development workflow and tooling, which tracks with the overall technical sophistication.

The combination of technical tools with Hubspot Marketing Hub (15x more likely) reveals these companies are marketing-led growth operations. They're likely agencies, marketing teams at mid-stage startups, or digital-first brands that need to move fast on content while maintaining technical flexibility. They're probably Series A to Series C stage, past the scrappy MVP phase but not yet locked into enterprise contracts.

👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Sanity.io?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 4,011 companies that use Sanity.io

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Country: NO
33.0x
Funding Stage: Series B
27.5x
Funding Stage: Series A
20.6x
Funding Stage: Private equity
16.0x
Industry: Entertainment
9.2x
Country: SE
7.4x
I noticed Sanity.io attracts an incredibly diverse range of companies, but they share a common thread: they're all building or managing significant digital presences. These aren't just companies with websites. They're organizations where content is central to their business model, whether that's media publishers like British Vogue and Rough Draft Atlanta, e-commerce platforms, SaaS companies building complex product experiences, or service businesses that need to communicate expertise and build trust online. Many are in sectors experiencing digital transformation: healthcare facilities, real estate agencies, financial services, manufacturing firms with direct-to-consumer channels, and education providers.

The funding and employee data reveals a sweet spot: primarily growth-stage companies with 11-200 employees. While there are some larger enterprises (FDM with 428 employees, Home Instead) and early-stage startups (seed and pre-seed funded), the majority are past the initial startup phase but not yet corporate giants. Many show no recent funding rounds, suggesting they're profitable and scaling sustainably rather than venture-backed hypergrowth plays.

Alternatives and Competitors to Sanity.io

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Sanity.io Sanity.io Contentstack Contentstack Storyblok Storyblok

Loading data...