We detected 515,879 companies using LLMs.txt, 561 companies that churned, and 27,179 customers with upcoming renewal in the next 3 months. The most common industry is IT Services and IT Consulting (5%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (41%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.
Note: Our data also tracks websites that install plugins that automatically generates a llms.txt
The count of new companies shown here may differ from the total in the table above. This is intentional. We apply a consistent baseline to ensure month-over-month comparisons are apples-to-apples rather than affected by when data was first collected.
Loading trends...
No trend data available for this vendor.
Market Insights
🏢 Top Industries
IT Services and IT Consulting16644 (5%)
Business Consulting and Services15439 (5%)
Construction15411 (5%)
Software Development15299 (5%)
Non-profit Organizations12108 (4%)
📏 Company Size Distribution
2-10 employees166422 (41%)
11-50 employees119013 (29%)
51-200 employees50232 (12%)
201-500 employees31622 (8%)
1 employee employees18868 (5%)
📊 Who usually uses LLMs.txt and for what use cases?
Source: Analysis of job postings that mention LLMs.txt (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)
Job titles that mention LLMs.txt
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention LLMs.txt.
Job Title
Share
SEO/GEO Specialist
31%
Digital Marketing Specialist
19%
Frontend Engineer
13%
Director of Marketing
6%
I noticed that SEO and GEO specialists represent 31% of roles, followed by digital marketing specialists at 19%. The buyers of LLMs.txt sit primarily in marketing departments, with strategic priorities centered on what one posting calls "ensuring visibility in AI-generated search results" and optimizing for "AI answer engines (Gemini, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude)". Directors and senior marketing leaders are hiring teams specifically to manage this transition from traditional search to AI-driven discovery, recognizing that search has evolved into what another posting describes as "a complex ecosystem of Generative AI, LLM citations and traditional search."
The day-to-day users are technical marketers and frontend engineers who implement and maintain LLMs.txt files alongside traditional SEO work. One posting explicitly mentions "managing llms.txt and robots.txt for AI crawlers and optimizing technical content for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) workflows." These practitioners are conducting technical audits, implementing schema markup, and ensuring websites are what multiple postings call "AI-readable" or "machine-readable."
The core pain point I see across these postings is discoverability in a post-Google world. Companies want to be "the primary source of truth" and ensure they are "cited as the primary authority in AI-generated answers." One company explicitly states their goal of being "cited" in LLM responses, while another seeks to optimize "visibility and brand sentiment in GenAI-powered search platforms." These organizations recognize that being invisible to AI systems means losing relevance with developers and technical buyers who increasingly use AI tools for research.
👥 What types of companies use LLMs.txt?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 515,879 companies that use LLMs.txt
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely LLMs.txt customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Industry: Law Practice
3.3x
Funding Stage: Series C
3.1x
Funding Stage: Series B
2.9x
Country: United States
2.8x
Funding Stage: Pre seed
2.7x
Country: India
2.7x
I noticed something surprising: LLMs.txt users are overwhelmingly small to mid-sized service businesses, not the tech companies you might expect. These are marketing agencies, law firms, real estate developers, medical practices, construction companies, and local retailers. They're the backbone of local economies: a cider farm in Vancouver, an orthopedic clinic in Jacksonville, a robotics education center in Austria, a salon in Dubai. Very few are pure software companies. Most build physical things, provide professional services, or operate brick-and-mortar locations.
These companies skew toward established small businesses rather than startups. The typical profile has 10-50 employees, has been operating for 5-20 years, and shows no venture funding. When funding appears at all, it's modest grants or seed rounds under $5M. The employee count discrepancies (listing "8 employees" but showing "51-200" in parentheses) suggest many are filling out profiles aspirationally or inaccurately. They're past survival mode but not scaling aggressively.
🔧 What other technologies do LLMs.txt customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 515,879 companies that use LLMs.txt
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely LLMs.txt customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that companies using LLMs.txt are serious about being discovered online, particularly through AI and search channels. The combination of AIOSEO, Google Search Console, and Cloudflare tells me these are companies obsessing over their digital presence and technical infrastructure. They're not just building products but actively working to make sure those products can be found, both by traditional search engines and now by LLMs scraping the web.
The pairing of AIOSEO with LLMs.txt makes perfect sense. These companies already understand SEO deeply, and they're extending that mindset to AI discoverability. It's the same strategic thinking applied to a new channel. Microsoft Clarity appearing so frequently is equally telling. These teams are measuring everything, watching how visitors interact with their sites, and constantly optimizing. LinkedIn Ads paired with this technical foundation suggests B2B companies running sophisticated campaigns while ensuring their organic presence is bulletproof.
My analysis shows these are marketing-led organizations, likely in growth stage rather than early startup phase. They have the resources to invest in multiple marketing tools and the sophistication to care about emerging technologies like LLM crawlers. The Cloudflare correlation reveals they're handling real traffic and care about performance. The Intune presence suggests many have reached the stage where they're managing employee devices and taking security seriously, pointing to companies with at least 50-100 employees.
Alternatives and Competitors to LLMs.txt
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category