We detected 3,189 companies using Front.com. The most common industry is Software Development (19%) and the most common company size is 11-50 employees (38%). We find new customers by monitoring new entries and modifications to company DNS records.
Note: We only track customers who decide to send customer emails through Front.com
Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage100 (4%)
📏 Company Size Distribution
11-50 employees1197 (38%)
51-200 employees849 (27%)
2-10 employees591 (19%)
201-500 employees269 (9%)
501-1,000 employees115 (4%)
👥 What types of companies use Front.com?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 3,189 companies that use Front.com
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Front.com customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Series E
97.2x
Funding Stage: Series D
67.2x
Funding Stage: Series C
66.9x
Industry: Political Organizations
15.9x
Industry: Software Development
10.8x
Industry: Truck Transportation
9.0x
I noticed that Front.com's typical customers are incredibly diverse in what they build and sell, but they share a common thread: they're all operating businesses that require significant customer interaction. These aren't just tech companies. I'm seeing everything from financial services platforms like Mercury and Shine France, to logistics operators like DCL Logistics and Transfix, to consumer brands like ZenART Supplies and Revival Shots. What unites them is that they're running real operations that depend on responsive, organized communication with customers, partners, or users.
The stage distribution is fascinating. I'm seeing a healthy mix, but growth-stage companies dominate. There are seed-funded startups like RetroRate (2.2M) and Factor (6M), but also substantially larger operations like DoiT (672 employees), Mercury (1,412 employees), and Octopus Energy (3,031 employees). The sweet spot appears to be companies with 11-200 employees who've achieved product-market fit and are scaling operations.
🔧 What other technologies do Front.com customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 3,189 companies that use Front.com
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Front.com customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Front.com users are overwhelmingly high-growth B2B companies with a strong emphasis on operational efficiency and cross-functional collaboration. The presence of tools like Linear, Golinks, and Ashby suggests these are scaling startups that have moved beyond scrappy early days but haven't yet ossified into enterprise bureaucracy. They're obsessed with internal productivity and reducing friction across teams.
The pairing of Front with Linear is particularly telling. These companies treat customer support and product development as tightly integrated functions rather than separate silos. When a customer issue comes through Front, it likely flows directly into Linear as a bug report or feature request. Adding Ashby to this mix reveals another layer: these are companies growing fast enough that recruiting is a core competency, not an HR afterthought. They need sophisticated hiring workflows because they're constantly building teams. The Golinks correlation is almost comical in how perfectly it fits. These companies create internal shortcuts for everything because their teams move fast and context-switching costs matter.
The full stack screams product-led growth companies that have discovered they need human support as they scale upmarket. They're not sales-led in the traditional sense, but they're maturing beyond pure self-service. Amplitude's presence confirms they're data-driven and likely have a freemium or trial motion where product analytics drive conversion. Dialpad suggests remote-first teams that still need real-time communication for complex customer issues.
Alternatives and Competitors to Front.com
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category